A Geek's Opinion

A small geek with a loud voice.
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
  • Recommended blogs
  • Recommended Software
  • Email me!

Safari 4 vs. Firefox 3.5 vs Opera 9.64

2009/07/05

Now this is going to be an interesting review. I have used everyone of this browsers in their previous builds, so am particularly keen to get this underway.

Now since I already had Safari 4 I had to install the others. Firefox as per normal installed really quickly, but as for Opera it took a bit to get going. Hopefully it does not get beat by IE8. Sorry I am not a big fan of Internet Explorer.

For my browser tests I am using Futuremarks Pacekeeper Browser benchmark. A very unique tool.

Pacekeeper

The first right out of Pacekeepers oven was Safari 4 with a score of 4177. Because it had raised the bar yesterday with IE8 I knew Firefox and Opera would have to be quick.

It was pointed out to me yesterday that Safari is a RAM hungry beast, so to make my tests fair I took a look at how much RAM they each chewed. All these results are based on idle. (0%-5% CPU usage).

image That is a lot of RAM. That is what we called ridiculous… But if you have plenty of RAM you should be right.

image That’s better.

image That’s bad but not as bad as Safari.

Okay now onto the results…

image

If you click on the image you will get a better view.

As we can all see Safari 4 is still the fastest Browser out there. But you have to have to the RAM to go with it. Firefox is a very good browser. I personally would recommend it, because it doesn’t use a lot of RAM and it is still quick. Opera did beat IE8 but it still likes a lot of RAM. So who wins?

I am not handing the winning title to anyone. There are really two winners. For people with a older system and not a whole lot of RAM go for Firefox but if you have the RAM get Safari 4. As for Opera, I feel it is getting better the ideas are good but it need the speed to go with it.

But wait I forgot Chrome, So I will have another review coming up today to see how polished Chrome version 2 really is. Will it make Safari use all the RAM I have got? I hope not.

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories
Reviews
Tags
Firefox, free, Internet, Opera, Safari 4, software
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Windows 7: My triumph, something that makes me love PC again. My computer just BSOD »

5 Responses to “Safari 4 vs. Firefox 3.5 vs Opera 9.64”

  1. kevin says:
    2009/07/27 at 11:02 pm

    oooh, a nice comment area.
    anyway, i think the different pages in the web are factors to the physical memory usage of the browsers. page elements like AJAX, the image rendering, and the like may turn the tide around.
    on my experience, opera had problems with facebook. it sort of failed to load some post-action javascript events. im not sure though.  :)
    thanks for the post. i havent heard of pacekeeper before i read this ^^

  2. thegeek says:
    2009/07/28 at 10:01 am

    No problem ma, glad I could help.

  3. Paul says:
    2009/08/25 at 11:32 am

    Apple Safari takes more resources compared to Opera and Firefox. sometimes it also freezes so i would still stick to Opera.

  4. Sunmi says:
    2009/10/14 at 12:16 am

    i really love the layout of Safari 4. the graphics of this browser looks much better than firefox.

  5. thegeek says:
    2009/11/05 at 6:12 pm

    It is good hey, I haven”t changed my web browser since the review.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Latest Poll

Are you on Twitter?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Categories

  • News
  • Open-Source Software
  • Reviews
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • Today’s Internet: Phishing Paradise.
  • Gaming or Blogging: Both a waste of time?
  • Managing school and blogging: Good old Google
  • Tweet, blog and vlog for a living: What a life.
  • College: Three days of hell?

Tags

3 3gs all in one PC AMD AOL Apple Apple ad's Apple vs. PC australia bay beta Blog blogging Call of duty chat Cloud Eee free gaming Google hacking Intel Internet Ion iphone Mac Microsoft Mobile Me netbook Nvidia Ion PC PC vs. Mac Reviews Safari Safari 4 software Starcraft 2 switching to a mac technology the pirate bay twitter video editing Virus vlogging windows

Recent Comments

  • Richter on Google Chrome 2: Is it ready to face Safari’s mighty RAM eating roar?
  • Moray Bite on Open Office 3.1.0 review
  • Yonica on Asus Eee PC 1000HE reviewed.
  • Techgirl 20 on Asus Eee PC 1000HE reviewed.
  • mazza36 on Open Office 3.1.0 review

Archives

  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Stats

  • Total Stats
    • 65 Posts
    • 169 Tags
    • 183 Comments
    • 49 Comment Posters
    • 0 Links
    • 42 Spam Blockeds
  • 10 Most Commented Posts
    • Open Office 3.1.0 review - 28 comments
    • My plans for the future: Windows 7 - 11 comments
    • A good cheap webcam – is there such a thing? - 10 comments
    • Asus Eee PC 1000HE reviewed. - 10 comments
    • Managing school and blogging: Good old Google - 6 comments
    • I am done with PCs: Time to give Apple a shot. - 5 comments
    • Safari 4 vs. Firefox 3.5 vs Opera 9.64 - 5 comments
    • Safari 4 vs. Internet Explorer 8 - 5 comments
    • Netbooks sales say “hello” to NASA in space. - 4 comments
    • Limewire: How to get a virus. - 4 comments

Views

  • Open Office 3.1.0 review - 10,438 views
  • Safari 4 vs. Firefox 3.5 vs Opera 9.64 - 1,400 views
  • Safari 4 vs. Internet Explorer 8 - 1,245 views
  • My computer just BSOD - 626 views
  • Limewire: How to get a virus. - 585 views
  • Four more reasons why you NEED to get the new IPhone 3G… - 519 views
  • Log In - 422 views
  • Why is World of Warcraft so addicting? - 346 views
  • Recommended Software - 332 views
  • Will the number of Twitter followers you have get you a job? - 311 views
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox